# Tajikam Worldwide Community

## General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Unity on August 01, 2009, 07:11:12 AM

 Title: A small mathmatical problem. Post by: Unity on August 01, 2009, 07:11:12 AM somebody sent me this simple mathmatical problem, can you solve them?  two of them have been solved as an example you need to do the rest of it.  in any case the total must remain 6, you are allowed to use any mathmatical operation, but not allowed to add any new number:1 1 1 = 6 2 + 2 + 2 = 6 ----->example3 3 3 = 6 4 4 4 = 6 5 5 5 = 6 6 + 6 - 6 = 6 ----->example7 7 7 = 6 8 8 8 = 6 9 9 9 = 6 Title: Re: A small mathematical problem. Post by: Khurasanzad on August 02, 2009, 03:40:11 PM Have you also the answer of it? Without adding new numbers you can´t work with it. Maybe if you use algorithm but it´s difficult.3x3-3=6 Title: Re: A small mathematical problem. Post by: Unity on August 03, 2009, 01:43:21 AM Quote from: Khurasanzad on August 02, 2009, 03:40:11 PMHave you also the answer of it? Without adding new numbers you can´t work with it. Maybe if you use algorithm but it´s difficult.3x3-3=6The one you have solved is correct.  And yes, it is possible to do it without adding new numbers.  Try again and the others too.  Keep in mind that all mathmatical operations are allowed including division, subraction, addition and multiplication. Title: Re: A small mathmatical problem. Post by: Unity on August 03, 2009, 02:53:55 AM Quote from: Khurasanzad on August 02, 2009, 03:40:11 PMHave you also the answer of it? Without adding new numbers you can´t work with it. Maybe if you use algorithm but it´s difficult.3x3-3=6You dont have to go that high, the logarithm is not needed to solve it.  if you want to use logaritm you need to have the table, if you go that way it will be a bit complicated. Title: Re: A small mathmatical problem. Post by: Khurasanzad on August 03, 2009, 06:05:07 AM Quote from: Unity on August 03, 2009, 02:53:55 AMQuote from: Khurasanzad on August 02, 2009, 03:40:11 PMHave you also the answer of it? Without adding new numbers you can´t work with it. Maybe if you use algorithm but it´s difficult.3x3-3=6You dont have to go that high, the logarithm is not needed to solve it.  if you want to use logaritm you need to have the table, if you go that way it will be a bit complicated.Is it allowed to use exponentiation? I ask you because It´s not really adding new numbers but somehow it is...for ex. 4*3=64. 3 is here the exponent. Have you already solved it? Title: Re: A small mathmatical problem. Post by: PORS on August 04, 2009, 04:21:18 PM Here is for 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7:(1+1+1)!=6(4+4)-(root of 4)=65+(5/5)=6(6-6)+6=67-(7/7)=6By the way, check with Wolfram website to see if it's correct. Wolfram is a great source of knowledge. USE IT!http://www.wolframalpha.com/ (http://www.wolframalpha.com/)- Pors Title: Re: A small mathmatical problem. Post by: Unity on August 06, 2009, 11:34:32 AM Quote from: PORS on August 04, 2009, 04:21:18 PMHere is for 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7:(1+1+1)!=6(4+4)-(root of 4)=65+(5/5)=6(6-6)+6=67-(7/7)=6By the way, check with Wolfram website to see if it's correct. Wolfram is a great source of knowledge. USE IT!http://www.wolframalpha.com/ (http://www.wolframalpha.com/)- Porsyes pors bro, they are all correct, but 8 and 9 was missing. Title: Re: A small mathmatical problem. Post by: Unity on August 06, 2009, 01:14:32 PM Quote from: Khurasanzad on August 03, 2009, 06:05:07 AMQuote from: Unity on August 03, 2009, 02:53:55 AMQuote from: Khurasanzad on August 02, 2009, 03:40:11 PMHave you also the answer of it? Without adding new numbers you can´t work with it. Maybe if you use algorithm but it´s difficult.3x3-3=6You dont have to go that high, the logarithm is not needed to solve it.  if you want to use logaritm you need to have the table, if you go that way it will be a bit complicated.Is it allowed to use exponentiation? I ask you because It´s not really adding new numbers but somehow it is...for ex. 4*3=64. 3 is here the exponent. Have you already solved it?yes i have solved them, you are allowed to use any mathmatical method.  i give you a hint, exponentials are not needed to solve it.