Parsistani, on 14 May 2011 - 08:35 PM, said:
Killing the enemy of my enemy and the enemy self is a very good thing.. and Pakis and Pashtuns together are our enemies. And now after killing 80 Pakis and 200 injured bastards from the tribal areas the Pakis will also hunt the ''bad Taliban''
Ok, lets forget about killing and being killed. Killings doesnt guarantee the victory and we shouldnt emphasize on it, if that was the case, then NATO killed many many Taliban, but the Taliban have only gotten stronger. Our goal shouldnt be killing, but rather how to reach to what want.
but we know that there is no such a thing like bad and good Taliban.
The Good Taliban and Bad Taliban only exist among Pakistanis, but for us, they are both the same and have been in war with us.
Pakistan use Awghan tribalism and Khark***wali to gain what it claim to deserves.
Pakistan dont deserve anything, i dont know why you say that.
The Durandline example was just only one of many examples. If we would be in Paki´s situation we would do the same and I say let´s use Awghans against Pakis.
No buddy, they are wrong, if they really care aboutr the issue of pashtunistan, then they dont need to be our enemy. Secondly how do you use Awghans against pakis?
What they do is wrong (caused at least nearly 2mio. deaths) but they do it because they have a reason and one and the main reasons are Pashtuns, their fake claims, their tribalic behaviour and fake nationalism.
They are wrong, but give it a reason? it is plainly wrong. We didnt claim on Pashtunistan, why are they against us?
Taliban get supported by us against Pakis in the name of independant Pashtunistan
Can you give me more explanation on this please?
... but of courese we look to weak them and Paki at the same time and destroy as much as we can.
But what will we get from the destruction of paksitan? we will be the first to lose. Lets dont be emontional.
Time for badal. My ancestors killed these Pigtuns in masses and threw them in cages when they entered our lands, took their women and daughters and I will keep these old tradition on these pigs.
please elaborate on this.
Than wake up and take another sit to have another view. America does not want any peace agreement with Taliban as long their influence go beyond Paktia, Kandahar and Khowst. THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN and I just posted a new article on facebook that back my opinion without beeing influenced by this article.
American dont look into afghanistan and their interests based on provinces, they see it in a regional thing.
There are many figures. But real scholaric and academic sources as I posted many times show them as a minority. Tajiks make up at least 40%. Awghans claim they are majority but can´t prove it but on the otherside that is an traditzional assumptation based on Musahiban Khark**wali policy by calling unreliable claims. I have never seen any demographical studies made by CIA ... and majority of the sources that today occures which are mostly reliable but not to 100% set the figure of Awghoos highly on 40%. Unfortunately, you again fail to see through a real political eye.
so far i havent seen such a thing, once i saw somewhere in here that it showed more tajik than pashtun, but that was not statistics, it was a survey of some random people whom identified their ethnic background, but if you have such an authentic data, then please tell us. even if you look at the population based on provinces, then pashtons are more than us.